wordpress stat

Similar Posts

    None Found

StatPress

Visits today: 148
2,247 views

Possibly, why Islam forbids eating Pork?

I was having one of those stimulating discussions with my brother O. and my sister E. about the genetic engineering field.  O. was briefing us about the latest news in the organ replacement and transplantation field.  This discussion soon evolved into a discussion in which we pondered if there is a relationship between Islam and Judaism forbidding eating pork and genetic engineering.

I think that xenotransplantation is acceptable in most religions. (xenotransplantation is the transfer of living organs, tissues, or cells from one species to another to replace the ever increasing organ shortages.) Both Islam and Judaism forbid the eating of pork, but accept xenotransplantation on the basis that humans have a higher place in the world and therefore have the right to use animals for their welfare, as long as the animals are treated with respect.

However the question that poses itself here is if the opposite holds true? Is it possible that Islam forbids eating pork because pigs have proven to be one of the best sources to supply organs to humans?

Maybe we will find a plausible reason soon… and the reason will be more convincing than the old debates about the pig eating its shit, or because it is polygamous!

By the way I know about genetic engineering as much as I know about Chinese language… so I am counting on O.’s contribution here.
Omar
Most organ transplants nowadays are considered to be relatively safe and routine procedures. However, the global demand for organs for patients waiting for transplantation is not being met. Recently, scientists and researchers are placing great hopes on being able to use cross-species transplants between humans and animals to help alleviate part of the shortage. This process is called xenotransplantaion.

Most animal organs have been extensively researched to find the most suitable replacement to that of humans. Of all the different animals, baboons and pigs are the favored xenotransplant donors. Baboons and chimpanzees are genetically close to humans. However, because of their developed social structure, human-like behaviors, and the large number of viruses they host; many ethical and medical issues were raised concerning their use; as a result, pigs became the most likely candidates for the job; mainly because of certain characters they hold, such as: pigs have organ sizes that are very similar to those of humans, and their genes can be easily inserted in human DNA.

Risks
1- Many public health concerns regarding the clinical trials of xenotransplantation have been raised. The major growing fear in transplanting animal organs, cells and tissues into humans is that such transplants might expose humans to the many different viruses primates and other animal harbor
2- Hyper acute Rejection usually caused by the natural antibodies

3- Acute vascular rejection

4- Ethical issues

Madas
This whole debate makes me think of the novel Never Let Me Go by Japanese/British author Kazuo Ishiguro, who also wrote the Remains of the day…The book is disturbing in the sense that when I finished the last word, I realized that I had been sobbing for a while… However it is also absolutely touching. Ishiguro always allows his characters to reveal their human weaknesses via veiled but suggestive language and situations. Usually the feelings feel very real and plausible.

  • Share/Bookmark

15 comments to Possibly, why Islam forbids eating Pork?

  • the hyperacute and vascular rejections are also potential complication by transplanting organs from humans to humans, and can be prevented by pre-transplant testing.
    I still couldn’t make the relation between transplanting organs from pigs and eating them??

    Reply

  • Madas

    Still have not figured it out :) but what i am trying to say that maybe a reason could be found in this area at some point in the future…

    Reply

  • I think the religious prohibition against eating pork probably had some sort of practical reason behind it. For example, pigs can carry the parasite trichinosis. If the meat is not thoroughly cooked, the parasite can infest the eater of the meat. Another thought is that the pig was just a taboo animal for some reason. Maybe a pig oinked at a Jewish priest the wrong way and so he declared the pig was evil. ;)

    I know that heart valves from pigs have been transplanted into human hearts now for the past several decades, at least.

    I have heard about the genetic engineering of pigs to make their tissues more compatible with humans. I don’t know exactly when pig organs will be available for transplant, but it could be just a few years away.

    Regarding the risk of virus transmission from animal organs, there is a theory that the AIDS epidemic may have begun this way. Back in the 1950’s a vaccine was made from chimpanzee kidneys that were ground up and injected into thousands of African test subjects. Some people have suggested that the Chimp version of HIV, known as SIV (S is for Simian), may have mutated in one of the test subjects into the form that is deadly to humans. However, other AIDS researchers believe that the origin of the epidemic is even older, maybe dating to the 1940’s or 1930’s. It could have just been a case of a hunter getting infected with SIV from an ape’s blood.

    I really loved the movie The Remains of the Day! What a sad story it was though.

    Reply

  • Madas

    Thanks for your comment. Who knows… a lot of theories are possible, although i would like to hear a scientifically convincing reason.

    I actually read something somilar about AIDS somewhere… It seems very possible… (see i always keep an open mind to a scientifically convincing reasons :)

    Anyway… I didn’t see the movie… I read the book, and it was very touching… a cool dude this Ishiguro

    Reply

  • I like the new look of your blog Mariam. :)

    Reply

  • Madas

    Merci :) I really got tired of the old one.. i will try to create one of my own soon

    Reply

  • abdulrauf sivany

    Pigs are prohabited in Islam and Judism due to its polygamy nature and the filth eating tasks assigned to it. Any habits of animals eaten by human being are reflective in human being hence the porno-style living in the societies who eat pork.

    Abdulrauf Sivany

    Reply

  • Sana

    Regarding the topic that why muslims do not eat pigs, after studying little bit of biology ( which is so not my subject ), I always thought that since pigs are the best ones to provide humans with compatible organs this probably could be the most valid reason that Islam prohibits the consumption of pig. However, there are many other reasons too which are mentioned everywhere that pigs are the filthiest of all animals and as humans mind and soul do get effected by what they consume, they should avoid the consumption of such swine flesh.
    Scientifically proven experiments and facts are becoming more welcomed in the societies as compared to religious believes. Nevertheless, the way science is growing that day is not far when all the facts which are already mentioned in islam will be proven scientifically as well.

    Reply

  • seriously, you have some wonderfully thought provoking posts on your blog! I thought that Pork was haraam/non-kosher because pigs dont have proper protuding necks and hence cannot be killed in the halaal/kosher way, also of all the meats, pork is most susceptible to parasites and what not, and I also thing they are happy to eat meat. Now, I have never heard of xenotransplantation, but if we are not allowed to consume pigs, would we be allowed to sew bits of them into our bodies? I guess that depends on how the verse that forbids the eating of pig meat is constructed…

    Reply

    Madas Reply:

    :) ohh I will take that as a complement :)

    I have recently watched a documentary about pigs… and it was shocking! I mean pigs are probably one of the most intelligent animals… and guess what?…they have feelings! In this documentary, they showed us how they feel fear and pain to the point that they start crying when anther pig is slaughtered in front of them!
    I honestly think that the reason why eating them is forbidden is much more sophisticated that we imagine…

    On a different note, I was recently having a conversation with a religious person and he told me that in the Islamic culture there is a story about human beings who devolved into monkeys and pigs as a punishment… it truly and seriously got me to think… I mean if it is true, then I really don’t want to eat a fellow human being and if it is not true, then damn… why did they chose these particular animals ? that thought is interesting on several levels!
    Anyway… I am exhausted… so I am off to bed!

    Reply

  • lol :) it WAS a compliment, I enjoy reading your posts :) I did not know that pigs were that sensitive, but doesnt it apply to all animals? Isnt Halaal to be discrete when killing an animal, and we cant kill one in front of another? bas ibsar maybe pigs are even more sensitive.

    Reply

  • Jdavz

    Read right around Surah 5:60 in Quran. It suggests that Pigs were once humans. I respectfully submit that the similarities between humans and swine may have a reason currently buried in our current understanding of History. Nevertheless, if it IS true, consuming Pork might seem like a sort of cannibalism.

    Odd how Fundamental Evolutionists often discount the possibility that the genetic structure of an animal might actually degenerate. If it so does, it may be safe to assume that the degeneration of tribes of humans into apes and swine as willed by the Most High did, in fact happen. Unfortunately, the Noble Book does not seem (to my limited knowledge, as of this moment) to give any clues as to “How” or “over what space of time” such a degeneration may have occured. It simply says that the Almighty willed that those who debased the Law (Torah?) were turned into Apes and Swine. Fascinating, to me, if a little horrifying, considering I was once fond of bacon.

    Reply

    Madas Reply:

    Thank you for your comment and welcome to my space.

    I felt your comment to be thought provoking… I believe in devolution as much as I believe in evolution… let’s make a comparison between rabbits and humans on the issue of the appendix for example, and we can see that the appendix does not have the same function in both creatures… even though research proves that they had the same function once upon a time…which proves that devolution happened… so yes… it is very plausible.

    Reply

  • You put together an excellent point with what you explained. People have to read your posting so they can have a better perspective on this issue. It was perfect of you to supply great points and supporting justifications. After reading this, I know my thoughts are extremely clear about the topic. Continue the great work!

    Reply

  • Madas

    Thank you for you kind words, please read other posts.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>